Some of the things that happened while I was sleeping:
Seems that John Hagee, one of McCain’s backers, a man whose endorsment McCains sought out, has praised Hitler as a servant of God:
John Hagee, the controversial evangelical leader and endorser of Sen. John McCain, argued in a late 1990s sermon that the Nazis had operated on God’s behalf to chase the Jews from Europe and shepherd them to Palestine. According to the Reverend, Adolph Hitler was a “hunter,” sent by God, who was tasked with expediting God’s will of having the Jews re-establish a state of Israel.
Going in and out of biblical verse, Hagee preached: “‘And they the hunters should hunt them,’ that will be the Jews. ‘From every mountain and from every hill and from out of the holes of the rocks.’ If that doesn’t describe what Hitler did in the holocaust you can’t see that.”
He goes on: “Theodore Hertzel is the father of Zionism. He was a Jew who at the turn of the 19th century said, this land is our land, God wants us to live there. So he went to the Jews of Europe and said ‘I want you to come and join me in the land of Israel.’ So few went that Hertzel went into depression. Those who came founded Israel; those who did not went through the hell of the holocaust.
“Then god sent a hunter. A hunter is someone with a gun and he forces you. Hitler was a hunter. And the Bible says — Jeremiah writing — ‘They shall hunt them from every mountain and from every hill and from the holes of the rocks,’ meaning there’s no place to hide. And that might be offensive to some people but don’t let your heart be offended. I didn’t write it, Jeremiah wrote it. It was the truth and it is the truth. How did it happen? Because God allowed it to happen. Why did it happen? Because God said my top priority for the Jewish people is to get them to come back to the land of Israel.”
McCain goes After Obama on Negotiations and Iraq, and Obama responds:
John McCain just issued a statement where he went for a double-whammy: slamming Obama for wanting to negotiate with tyrants while trying to paint him as inconsistent:
After Senator Obama’s own advisors and supporters backtracked from his stated desire to hold summit meetings with the leaders of the world’s worst regimes, Senator Obama himself has begun to reinterpret his stand. He now claims that some ‘fear’ to ‘negotiate’ with the likes of Iranian President Ahmadinejad, who has called Israel a ’stinking corpse’ or Ayatollah Khamenei, who called Israel a ‘cancerous tumor.’ I have news for Senator Obama: I have met some very bad people before in my life. It is not fear that drives my opposition to unconditional meetings with Ahmadinejad, Khamenei, Kim Jong Il, and Raul Castro; rather it is my clear understanding that such a course will fail to eliminate the threat posed by these rogue regimes.
(The new mention of Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, comes after a scathing blog post by Time columnist Joe Klein yesterday where he wrote, “Why doesn’t the McCain campaign and other assorted Republicans ever accuse Obama of wanting to negotiate with Khamenei? Well, because Khamenei isn’t quite the flagrant anti-Semite Ahmadinejad is…and, as we keep hearing, Obama has a Jewish problem.”)
McCain also doubles down on the war, pushing against Obama’s opposition to the surge in Iraq – which he frames as a product of inexperience. “Senator Obama has consistently offered his judgment on Iraq, and he has been consistently wrong. He said that General Petraeus’ new strategy would not reduce sectarian violence, but would worsen it. He was wrong.”
It’s an interesting tack, considering that the reports of the surge’s effects have failed to dampen opposition to the war.
UPDATE: Obama’s response –
While I always appreciate hearing the news from John McCain, he should explain to the American people why almost every single promise and prediction that he has made about Iraq has turned to be catastrophically wrong, including his support for a surge that was supposed to achieve political reconciliation. While John McCain offers his poor judgment in supporting George Bush’s war and a failed foreign policy that has left us less secure, I will continue to make the case for a new foreign policy that deploys all elements of American power – including tough, principled and direct diplomacy. It’s stunning that in such a lengthy written statement, John McCain could not articulate a single new idea that hasn’t been tried – and failed – over the last eight years.
Arlen Specter seems to agree with Obama on Negotiations:
Pennsylvania Republican Senator Arlen Specter spoke favorably this morning of Obama’s diplomatic approach. He just thinks McCain — whose candidacy he supports — should be doing the talking:
The Pennsylvanian, who has long championed sit-downs with enemies of the United States, told The Morning Call today that the country needs “a very fundamental shift in our thinking in our international diplomacy.”
“I’m not going to disagree with McCain, I’m going to tell him what I think,” Specter said. “I had some good talks with … [Yasser] Arafat and [Col. Muammar] Qaddafi and [Fidel] Castro.”
Specter has met with Syrian president Bashar al-Assad in recent years, in defiance of the Bush administration. Three years ago, he met with Venezuela president Hugo Chavez.
“I had a good talk with Chavez,” he said, pointing to a photograph of the two together in August 2005, one of many pictures of himself with foreign leaders that adorn his office walls. “We made some progress on some of the drug problems.”
Still, Specter shied away from endorsing the prospect of Obama himself meeting with such leaders, as well as Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and North Korea leader Kim Jong-il. He spoke with three Pennsylvania reporters in his Capitol office.
“I don’t know exactly how Obama is going to handle it. Obama does not have my experience or McCain’s experience,” he said.
Another Lobbyist problem for McCain:
John McCain’s top foreign policy adviser lobbied the Arizona senator’s staff on behalf of the republic of Georgia while he was working for the campaign, public records show.
Randy Scheunemann, founder of Orion Strategies, represented the governments of Macedonia, Georgia and Taiwan between 2003 and March 1, according to the firm’s filings with the Justice Department. In its latest semiannual report, the firm disclosed that Scheunemann had a phone conversation in November about Georgia with Richard Fontaine, an aide in McCain’s Senate office.
Orion Strategies earned $540,000 from its foreign clients over the year ending on Dec. 1, reports show. Scheunemann also received $56,250 last year from March to July from McCain, according to campaign finance records.
The campaign consulting fees ended at a time when McCain was under financial pressure to cut costs, but Scheunemann remained the campaign’s top foreign policy adviser. He represented McCain throughout last fall — including an appearance at a Republican Jewish Coalition event during the same week he lobbied McCain’s Senate office.
While not illegal or a breach of Senate ethics rules, Scheunemann’s lobbying of McCain’s staff as he was advising the campaign comes to light a week after McCain announced a new policy to avoid such conflicts. The new conflict-of-interest policy prohibits campaign workers from being registered lobbyists or foreign agents and bans part-time volunteers from policy discussions on issues involving their clients.
McCain’s stance on GI bill isn’t winning him any fans:
Of all the voting groups John McCain will target this fall, none would seem like more of a sure thing than this country’s war veterans. So why is the celebrated Vietnam War hero and POW bracing for a potentially bad week with so many men and women who have served in uniform?
The point of contention between the two seemingly natural allies is a piece of legislation the Senate is expected to vote on this week to update the 1944 G.I. Bill to provide expanded education assistance and opportunities to the armed forces. The bill, co-sponsored by two other Vietnam veterans in the Senate, Republican Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Democrat Jim Webb of Virginia, would effectively provide full tuition and housing costs at a four-year public university for veterans who have served at least three years of active duty. Given his family’s and his own long and distinguished service career, the bill would seem like a natural fit for the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. But McCain, concerned about the estimated $4 billion annual price tag and the incentive he worries it might give people to leave an already strapped military, has sponsored his own competing proposal. It increases the existing monthly education benefit from around $1,100 to $1,500 a month while adding more generous benefits for those who’ve served more than 12 years.
McCain’s concerns, however, don’t seem to impress the vast majority of veterans’ organizations. They are feverishly lobbying him to support the Webb and Hagel bill, which simply adds the new program’s expense to the $165 billion annual emergency war supplemental, a move President George W. Bush has threatened to veto. (The House version offsets the program by increasing taxes by 0.5% on those individuals who earn more than $500,000 a year and couples who earn more than $1 million, a move also under veto threat.) “This isn’t about anything partisan; we are firmly supporting the bill that does right by the veterans, does right by the troops, and that is not McCain’s bill,” said Ramona Joyce, a spokeswoman for the American Legion. “It could do McCain damage with veteran voters if this issue drags out.”
Even with the current dustup, it’s hard to imagine John McCain not winning the majority of the veterans vote in November. But the nation’s 26 million veterans are by no means a monolithic voting bloc, and any level of disappointment with McCain could sway some undecideds. The Democratic National Committee is already gleefully preparing TV spots about McCain’s position on the Senate bill. And, sensing a vulnerability in McCain’s seemingly greatest strength, some Democratic strategists are already contemplating what other veterans votes they can bring up this year.
